| 留园首页 新闻速递首页 热评新闻榜 新闻评论公告 72小时神评妙论 即刻热度新闻 |
回复3楼:你自己作弊就代表其他人作弊 ？按照你逻辑黑人也都该死？ 他咋不说黑人呢 说黄种人就是因为你这种没脊椎骨的玩意太多了
学校里就是经常有这么些种族歧视的败类，一经发现，最好能利用机会把他们搞臭，搞到他们一辈子难忘。
回复53楼:这编造的可能性太大了。稍微正常一点的人，怎么可能说出这种话？就像说我父母从来没有告诉过我要做一个好人。
这个教授所引用的话根本不符合逻辑，八成是自己编的。能上MIT的学生用moral and value这词然后说学校没教过？学校没教过他都根本说不出这词儿。能说出这词儿说明他很了解这词儿的意义。
哈哈，这在党国再正常不过！造假随处可见！从上到下，看看习大帝的小学文化如何获得经济学博士学位的！说到痛点，粉红玻璃心又碎了！
https://www.tiktok.com/@jieconnect/video/7448345714331077919?is_from_webapp=1&sender_device=pc&web_id=7447306897644521006
回复12楼:白皮不分公母，骨子里都是种族主义者。 不用猜，不用它们表现出来，都知道它们在想什么。
一个靠鼓吹ai ethic混饭吃的人有种族歧视，十分讽刺
讲AI嘛，别说干坏事的是中国人，就说他不是人就行了。大家都心里明白就行了，自己几斤几两，留园的人都更明白！
骗子国的人都理直气壮的。近日油管上一国内堵车时有不少人逆行而上的画面，当事人也是理直气壮，“就不排队咋了”？？？牛逼！
是的，台独人只要被欧美人提到，不管是被夸还是被骂，还是被歧视，他们都感到荣幸，台独畜牲的本性就是贱逼
回复17楼:台湾傻逼畜牲这时候肯定是跳高了表现，台湾畜牲真的不得好死
回复6楼::
特地来点赞！ 留园很少有人能对同胞发出由衷的赞叹！ 这个妹子是新一代华人的代表， 有自信、 有见识、有勇气、沟通能力强， 关键时刻能挺身而出， 巾帼不让须眉。
我当时听到这段提问， 口语地道， 以为是白人学生， 没想到是是咱们中国女生！
特地来点赞！ 留园很少有人能对同胞发出由衷的赞叹！ 这个妹子是新一代华人的代表， 有自信、 有见识、有勇气、沟通能力强， 关键时刻能挺身而出， 巾帼不让须眉。
我当时听到这段提问， 口语地道， 以为是白人学生， 没想到是是咱们中国女生！
回复4楼:像是经验之谈，是你自己的，还是你家人的？😉
回复33楼:Had she replaced Chinese with Israeli she would have been fired by now. She should be fired for her open expression of racial discrimination.
這個教授很可能就是AI製造種族武器滅絕中華民族甚至美籍華人以及有華人基因血脈的新納粹分子。不要因為她的道歉而放棄對她的警惕。她道歉衹是因為她自鳴得意的種族歧視被抓包而不是她心理對華人的刻骨仇恨。
MIT教授的智商和水平，不愧是蓝翔技校的领头羊
回复16楼:媒体和警方比较注意这些事，卢刚当年开枪杀人，媒体和警方只提“枪手”，回避了国籍和种族。后来深入报道时才细细叙述一切。学术界应该更是这样，应该只说“有学生作弊”，如果涉及处分等等“后续”之事，再细说背景种族等等，而且不应拉扯其他人，说什么“大多数很好”什么的。这是美国文化里的大忌，教授不如警察，念书念傻了？
回复31楼:email continued:
I urge MIT to address this incident and reaffirm its commitment to fostering an inclusive academic environment. Specific actions might include:
Issuing a statement that underscores MIT’s commitment to diversity, inclusion, and respect for all scholars, regardless of nationality.
Providing guidance and training to faculty on avoiding implicit bias in public speaking and teaching.
Engaging directly with affected communities to rebuild trust and ensure their voices are heard.
As one of the world’s leading institutions, MIT has the opportunity to set an example in promoting fairness, inclusivity, and respect in academia. I trust that under your leadership, MIT will take proactive steps to address this matter and uphold its values.
Thank you for your attention to this important issue. I am confident that MIT will continue to lead the way in creating a supportive and inclusive academic community for scholars of all backgrounds.
Sincerely,
ppplu
I urge MIT to address this incident and reaffirm its commitment to fostering an inclusive academic environment. Specific actions might include:
Issuing a statement that underscores MIT’s commitment to diversity, inclusion, and respect for all scholars, regardless of nationality.
Providing guidance and training to faculty on avoiding implicit bias in public speaking and teaching.
Engaging directly with affected communities to rebuild trust and ensure their voices are heard.
As one of the world’s leading institutions, MIT has the opportunity to set an example in promoting fairness, inclusivity, and respect in academia. I trust that under your leadership, MIT will take proactive steps to address this matter and uphold its values.
Thank you for your attention to this important issue. I am confident that MIT will continue to lead the way in creating a supportive and inclusive academic community for scholars of all backgrounds.
Sincerely,
ppplu
回复3楼:留言网有很多狗腿子，狗腿的，都是傻逼、脑残、弱智的那种，就比如3楼这种，3楼这种弱智傻逼狗粮，全家不得好死。就比如3楼这种，像3楼这种，大概率会的，狗粮一般不得好死，这是不争的事实。
行动起来！
To president@mit.edu
RE: Concern Regarding Implicit Bias towards Chinese Scholars in Keynote Speech by MIT Faculty Member
Dear President Sally Kornbluth,
I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to express my concern regarding remarks made by Professor Rosalind Picard, a faculty member at the MIT Media Lab, during her keynote speech at the NeurIPS conference on December 13, 2024, in Vancouver, Canada.
In her presentation, Professor Picard displayed a slide featuring the quote: "I did it to make my paper results look better. Nobody at my school taught us morals or values" and attributed it explicitly to a Chinese student who had been expelled from a top university. By unnecessarily emphasizing the student’s nationality in this context, the presentation perpetuated harmful stereotypes and reinforced implicit biases against Chinese scholars. Such a generalization is not only inaccurate but also counterproductive to fostering an inclusive and equitable academic environment.
MIT has long been regarded as a leader in diversity, inclusion, and the pursuit of excellence in global research. The words and actions of its faculty members reflect on the institution as a whole. By singling out a nationality in an example of academic misconduct, Professor Picard’s remarks risk alienating a significant portion of the international academic community, particularly the many Chinese scholars who contribute immensely to MIT and the broader scientific landscape.
It is crucial to recognize that academic misconduct is not confined to any one nationality or demographic. Highlighting nationality in this instance serves no educational purpose and instead reinforces divisive and prejudicial perceptions. Such comments can perpetuate feelings of exclusion among international scholars, contradicting the values of respect and mutual understanding that are foundational to academic collaboration.
I urge MIT to address this incident and reaffirm its commitment to
To president@mit.edu
RE: Concern Regarding Implicit Bias towards Chinese Scholars in Keynote Speech by MIT Faculty Member
Dear President Sally Kornbluth,
I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to express my concern regarding remarks made by Professor Rosalind Picard, a faculty member at the MIT Media Lab, during her keynote speech at the NeurIPS conference on December 13, 2024, in Vancouver, Canada.
In her presentation, Professor Picard displayed a slide featuring the quote: "I did it to make my paper results look better. Nobody at my school taught us morals or values" and attributed it explicitly to a Chinese student who had been expelled from a top university. By unnecessarily emphasizing the student’s nationality in this context, the presentation perpetuated harmful stereotypes and reinforced implicit biases against Chinese scholars. Such a generalization is not only inaccurate but also counterproductive to fostering an inclusive and equitable academic environment.
MIT has long been regarded as a leader in diversity, inclusion, and the pursuit of excellence in global research. The words and actions of its faculty members reflect on the institution as a whole. By singling out a nationality in an example of academic misconduct, Professor Picard’s remarks risk alienating a significant portion of the international academic community, particularly the many Chinese scholars who contribute immensely to MIT and the broader scientific landscape.
It is crucial to recognize that academic misconduct is not confined to any one nationality or demographic. Highlighting nationality in this instance serves no educational purpose and instead reinforces divisive and prejudicial perceptions. Such comments can perpetuate feelings of exclusion among international scholars, contradicting the values of respect and mutual understanding that are foundational to academic collaboration.
I urge MIT to address this incident and reaffirm its commitment to
好样的！在外国人面前，就是要不卑不亢。好样的。
回复3楼:我看到的几个用AI写作业被曝光的全是白人学生，高中，大学都有，而她偏偏挑Chinese说事？ 带有明显的种族偏见！ 最可悲的是黄皮狗粮表示支持？ 你们狗粮真该死！你们今天的反华言行早晚报应在你们自己身上
回复18楼:你爹妈这么教你的？利益优先? 那是你爹妈的问题！回家找你爹妈去！别拿所有中国人说事！ 另外这么明显的公开歧视，你们这些狗粮都能站队支持？说明“狗粮就是狗日的”一点没错！
回复15楼:后边一群狗粮杂种已经把地都舔下去一块了
不明白，为什么一定要注明“Chinese”？ 然后还假仁假义注明“不是所有中国人”。
那我是不是也可以举例：
《黑人零元购 作奸犯科》 （Note：并不是所有黑人都是罪犯）
《白种人性变态，恋童癖的成因》（Note：并不是所有白人都是变态）
《狗粮到底是不是人和狗的产物》（Note：并不是所有狗粮都是狗日的）
那我是不是也可以举例：
《黑人零元购 作奸犯科》 （Note：并不是所有黑人都是罪犯）
《白种人性变态，恋童癖的成因》（Note：并不是所有白人都是变态）
《狗粮到底是不是人和狗的产物》（Note：并不是所有狗粮都是狗日的）
个人觉得这个教授靠演讲来说这事儿有点傻，因为你是就事论事反对作弊，举例子的话，还不如说mit去年多少起确定的作弊案，再列一个表格显示学生来源国，这样第一让大家没法反驳，第二如果真的想攻击中国学生作弊人数多，也可以用事实说话，不被人攻击
真心问一下，在中国今天有学校教学生道德与价值观吗？
墙国人一个最大的缺点就是不正视事实，狡辩。
对国家，对自己都是这样。
对国家，对自己都是这样。
在美国如果有泥哥犯案，美媒基本不会提及肤色，反之没有提及肤色的罪犯大概率就是泥哥。这就是政治正确。这厮代表的一群人非得强调是中国人，为啥就不敢冒犯泥哥呢？学生抄袭作弊是只有中国学生才有还是中国学生此行为占比特别高？还是中国学生没有黑命贵的光环庇护呢？
这是留园所有嘴炮震天的无骨舔腚拴脖狗粮，这辈子都不敢做的事情!! 为妹子加油鼓掌。
非要提一下Chinese，不提chinese就不舒服，然后还自己找补一下说我不是说你们都是垃圾。 这么明显的歧视3楼说歧视的有理，真tm傻逼
回复4楼:你只能代表你自己。不要动不动把中国人扯上。
狗粮从出生起就看着一个东西，主子的屁眼，最喜欢吃的是里面挤出来的大便。狗粮为了吃屎肯定是要赞同这位主子的，狗粮们说是不是这样做了？今天吃屎了吗？点踩，说明吃过了。
回复3楼:这种事只能意会 不能说出来
现在中国年轻人中， 素质高的是真高！
我可能过后想出怎么对待这样的歧视，但不可能像这个女生一样当场有理有节不卑不亢的做出恰当的反应。
迅速而且恰当。很佩服！
我可能过后想出怎么对待这样的歧视，但不可能像这个女生一样当场有理有节不卑不亢的做出恰当的反应。
迅速而且恰当。很佩服！
20多年前在北大质问克林顿的那位女学生 最后还是嫁给了美国人 身体还是承实的 还是美国的家伙好用 chinese家伙小了点
来自中国大部分留学生考试都作弊，这是不争的事实。
下次试试弯弯学生
他们被主人提到感到是荣幸
不会反击
他们被主人提到感到是荣幸
不会反击
|
|
|
现在中国年轻人中， 素质高的是真高！
获赞最多的网友评论，将自动推送到留园神评妙论荟萃；
我可能过后想出怎么对待这样的歧视，但不可能像这个女生一样当场有理有节不卑不亢的做出恰当的反应。 迅速而且恰当。很佩服！ |
|
|
Copyright (C) 6park.com All rights Reserved.