| 留园首页 新闻速递首页 热评新闻榜 新闻评论公告 72小时神评妙论 即刻热度新闻 |
回复21楼:你意思是你比Physical Review Letter的评审及编辑更懂此项研究成果的分量？🙄
↓↓↓ 共 2 条评论 ↓↓↓
Comparison:
Both processors have 105 qubits, but they prioritize different aspects of quantum computing.
Zuchongzhi 3.0 has shown superior performance in certain computational benchmarks, while Willow is leading in error correction.
Therefore, it is not simply that one is "more advanced" than the other, but that they are advanced in different areas of quantum computing.
In essence:
If the goal is to demonstrate raw computational power for specific problems, Zuchongzhi 3.0 has shown very strong results.
If the goal is to build a practical, reliable quantum computer that can handle complex calculations with minimal errors, Google's Willow is making significant strides.
Therefore, they are both very advanced, but in different areas of quantum computing development.
Both processors have 105 qubits, but they prioritize different aspects of quantum computing.
Zuchongzhi 3.0 has shown superior performance in certain computational benchmarks, while Willow is leading in error correction.
Therefore, it is not simply that one is "more advanced" than the other, but that they are advanced in different areas of quantum computing.
In essence:
If the goal is to demonstrate raw computational power for specific problems, Zuchongzhi 3.0 has shown very strong results.
If the goal is to build a practical, reliable quantum computer that can handle complex calculations with minimal errors, Google's Willow is making significant strides.
Therefore, they are both very advanced, but in different areas of quantum computing development.
|
|
|
狗粮个个地下室大学刷盘专业博士后，不比什么教授院士高
获赞最多的网友评论，将自动推送到留园神评妙论荟萃；
|
|
|
Copyright (C) 6park.com All rights Reserved.