Comparison:
Both processors have 105 qubits, but they prioritize different aspects of quantum computing.
Zuchongzhi 3.0 has shown superior performance in certain computational benchmarks, while Willow is leading in error correction.
Therefore, it is not simply that one is "more advanced" than the other, but that they are advanced in different areas of quantum computing.
In essence:
If the goal is to demonstrate raw computational power for specific problems, Zuchongzhi 3.0 has shown very strong results.
If the goal is to build a practical, reliable quantum computer that can handle complex calculations with minimal errors, Google's Willow is making significant strides.
Therefore, they are both very advanced, but in different areas of quantum computing development.

I agree with what you mentioned "it is not simply that one is "more advanced" than the other, but that they are advanced in different areas of quantum computing."
but where you get the test result that saying Google's Willow is making significant strides that need build a practical, reliable quantum computer that can handle complex calculations with minimal errors"
?
however,in the article: "Parallel single-bit gate fidelity reaches 99.90%, parallel two-bit gate fidelity reaches 99.62%, parallel reading fidelity reaches 99.13%.
all these are actual test result.so why you think google can work with minimal errors?
and also if evaluation focused on absolute error quartiles,then it may not reasonable on the last conclusion.

那些迷魂汤上头的是不会懂这些的，也不屑于懂。他们会马上怼你说：难道你比那些审稿的物理大拿还懂么？他们也不会明白发paper的试验结果与投入实用之间有多大鸿沟